Update: What I'm asking is if there's any evidence in the field of language learning stating if a mere table with declensions is useful for learning those declensions.

This is opposed to the usual method of learning the declension by repeating its uses in real sentences (or in not so real ones).

There are many languages that use declension to express what function a word is expressing in a sentence (case), or to express its number and gender.

This declension may be on the nouns, adjectives, personal pronouns and articles (if any).

Is it really useful to have a table with these declensions? For example, one could use it as a visual guide, or try to "memorize" it by heart.

Related to that usefulness, is there a current trend regarding these tables? I've seen in many old language books that those tables were always present, but I've not seen them so much in modern books.

  • Useful for what? Such tables have a purpose, for which they are useful. For other purposes they are probably not useful.
    – Flimzy
    Commented Apr 6, 2016 at 13:59
  • 2
    I think that a common understanding and/or definition on this site that "useful" means "statistically significant" or expressible by some scientific study or research would be beneficial to preventing these types of questions from being closed as "too broad" or "primarily opinion-based". Studies regarding language learning would address this question quite well. Commented Apr 6, 2016 at 14:38
  • @Flimzy You have just said a tautology. What I ask is if those tables are useful to learn and assimilate the declension (usually endings).
    – Nicolás
    Commented Apr 6, 2016 at 15:29
  • The definition of useful in the context of a question like this is "Has anyone found utility in X to achieve Y?" This is not a very meaningful question, even if Y is well defined (and for this question it's not). Thus, I contend that these questions ought to be rephrased in some way to make them objective. "How is X useful (to achieve Y)?" This both makes it objective, avoids the yes/no dichotomy, and opens it up for possible unanticipated conclusions.
    – Flimzy
    Commented Apr 6, 2016 at 17:18

2 Answers 2


Declension endings in most languages are essential for the use of "correct" grammar. By using tables, you can "calculate" the correct endings. That could be better for "computationally" minded people than just relying on rote memory (which could sometimes go wrong, in my experience).

If you study and memorize tables of declension endings, you will know the correct endings and be well on your way to using correct grammar in the language, which will impress people.


In many learning contexts, the aim is for a skill to be so deeply ingrained that you do the right thing without any conscious effort - e.g. a musician hits a key or a string with just the right amount of force, a language learner uses the right tense or ending without thinking, a native speaker writes a word with the correct spelling etc.

But before this is possible, there is usually a stage at which conscious effort is needed, and during that stage various temporary aids for "getting things right" are used. Declension tables are such an aid. Their advantages lie in the fact that when a list is memorized, all items on the list can be easily retrieved by reciting the whole list from beginning to end (or until the desired item is reached); they are thus a very useful backup strategy for whatever method you use in order to gradually "develop a feeling" for correct endings.

Another advantage of declension tables is that they give a systematic overview and enable comparison: in many languages, two cases may share the same ending in some but not all paradigms, or one ending may correspond to different cases in different paradigms and all sorts of other confusing phenomena may happen. By virtue of conciseness, tables may be helpful to sort out the mess.

In developing teaching materials, the author considers aspects such as the age of the learners, their native and acquired languages, the amount of grammar instruction that they obtained in their mother tongue, previous experience with language learning, intensity of the course, etc. For example, I noticed that materials for English speaking students usually introduce individual cases one by one (and often did so even at the end of the 19th century - at least in Latin textbooks). This is because the whole concept of an "accusative" or "dative" is new to such students and needs to be internalized (besides the fact that the only English words where cases influence the form are pronouns, there additionally seems to be surprisingly little grammar instruction in the English speaking world), and throwing a declension table at them would be of little help. On the other hand, such an approach may be rather frustrating for students who have had a good training in recognizing a number of cases and paradigms in their mother tongue.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.